From The Honorable Sis. Cynthia McKinney: Has NATO Unleashed A Race War In Libya? Please Call Congress To Stop This Madness!
1.
Please call the House and Senate and ask for an end to this madness--defund US War Against Libya now! Please let them know that US Libyan allies, the "rebels," are cleansing Blacks out of areas under their control.
1.
Please call the House and Senate and ask for an end to this madness--defund US War Against Libya now! Please let them know that US Libyan allies, the "rebels," are cleansing Blacks out of areas under their control.
The House has just taken another vote and I will discuss its implications this evening.
House rejects measure to continue US role in Libya
By DONNA CASSATA, Associated Press
–
2 mins ago
WASHINGTON – The House on Friday overwhelmingly
rejected a measure giving President Barack Obama the authority to
continue the U.S. military operation against Libya, a major repudiation
of the commander in chief.
The vote was 295-123, with Obama losing the support
of 70 of his Democrats one day after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
Clinton had made a last-minute plea for the mission.
While the congressional action had no immediate
effect on American involvement in the NATO-led mission, it was an
embarrassment to a sitting president and certain to have reverberations
in Tripoli and NATO capitals.
The vote marked the first time since 1999 that either
House has voted against a military operation. The last time was over
President Bill Clinton's authority in the Bosnian war.
The House planned a second vote on legislation to cut off money for the operation.
House Republican leaders pushed for the vote, with
rank-and-file members saying the president broke the law by failing to
seek congressional approval for the 3-month-old war.
"The president has operated in what we now know is
called the zone of twilight as to whether or not he even needs our
approval," said Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Fla. "So what are we left with?"
Some Democrats accused the GOP of playing politics with national security. They said the vote would send a message to Gadhafi.
Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, the top Democrat on
the Armed Services Committee, said the vote would essentially "stop the
mission in Libya and empower Moammar Gadhafi."
The defeated resolution mirrors a Senate measure
sponsored by Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and John McCain, R-Ariz., that
Obama has indicated he would welcome. The Senate Foreign Relations
Committee will consider the resolution on Tuesday.
The second vote to eliminate money for the Libya
operation would make an exception for search and rescue efforts,
intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, aerial refueling and
operational planning to continue the NATO effort in Libya. That measure
has no chance in the Democratic-controlled Senate.
House Republicans and Democrats are furious with
Obama for failing to seek congressional authorization as required under
the War Powers Resolution. The 1973 law, often ignored by Republican and
Democratic presidents, says the commander in chief must seek
congressional consent for military actions within 60 days. That deadline
has long passed.
Obama stirred congressional unrest last week when he
told lawmakers he didn't need authorization because the operation was
not full-blown hostilities. NATO commands the Libya operation, but the
United States still plays a significant support role that includes
aerial refueling of warplanes and intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance work as well as drone attacks and bombings.
A New York Times report that said Obama overruled some of his legal advisers further incensed members of Congress.
In a last-ditch effort Thursday, Clinton met with
rank-and-file Democrats to explain the mission and discuss the
implications if the House votes to cut off funds. The administration
requested the closed-door meeting.
Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., said Clinton apologized for
not coming to Congress earlier. But he said she warned about the
implications of a House vote to cut off money.
"The secretary expressed her deep concern that you're
probably not on the right track when Gadhafi supports your efforts,"
Walz said.
Rep. Howard Berman of California, the top Democrat on
the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said such a vote "ensures the
failure of the whole mission."
Earlier this week Clinton said lawmakers were free to raise questions,
but she asked, "Are you on Gadhafi's side, or are you on the side of the
aspirations of the Libyan people and the international coalition that
has been bringing them support?"
In the Senate, backers of a resolution to authorize the operation
wondered whether the administration had waited too long to address the
concerns of House members.
"It's way late," said McCain, the top Republican on the Armed Services
Committee. "This is one of the reasons why they're having this veritable
uprising in the House, because of a lack of communication. And then the
icing on the cake was probably for them when he (Obama) said that we're
not engaged in hostilities. That obviously is foolishness."
He added, however, "That is not a reason to pass a resolution that would encourage Moammar Gadhafi to stay in power."
Earlier this month, the House voted 268-145 to rebuke Obama for failing
to provide a "compelling rationale" for the Libyan mission and for
launching U.S. military forces without congressional approval.
2.
Ethnic Cleansing of Black Libyans | ||||||||||||||||||
Black Star News Editorial
06-21-11
| ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
3. From the Wall Street Journal
Libya City Torn by Tribal Feud
Ethnic Hatred Rooted in Battle for Misrata Underlines Challenges the Nation Faces After Gadhafi
By SAM DAGHER
![[LIBDIVIDE]](http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WO-AF996_LIBDIV_G_20110620185718.jpg)
Associated Press
A Misrata fuel depot burns
after a pro-Gadhafi forces bombed it in March, part of a fight that
fanned tensions between Misrata and Tawergha.
MISRATA, Libya—"Traitors
keep out," reads graffiti at the entrance of a housing project in an
impoverished neighborhood of Misrata, the rebel-held city grappling with the physical and emotional scars of Col. Moammar Gadhafi's siege since March.
A group of men sipping tea in the courtyard on a recent afternoon say
the "traitors" are those who hail from Tawergha, a small town 25 miles
to the south inhabited mostly by black Libyans, a legacy of its
19th-century origins as a transit town in the slave trade.
Many Misratans are convinced that Tawerghans were responsible for
some of the worst atrocities committed during their city's siege,
including allegedly raping women in front of their relatives and helping
Gadhafi forces identify and kidnap rebel sympathizers and their
families.
The feud between Misrata and Tawergha offers a stark example of the challenges Libya will face in reconciling communities that found themselves on opposite sides of the conflict when Col. Gadhafi leaves power.
Misrata, Libya's third-largest city
and its commercial hub, has been viewed with suspicion by Col.
Gadhafi, who sought to promote minority groups like the Tawerghans and
some Bedouin tribes in the area to counterbalance the might of the
tightly knit white merchant families here.
Before the siege, nearly four-fifths of residents of Misrata's
Ghoushi neighborhood were Tawergha natives. Now they are gone or in
hiding, fearing revenge attacks by Misratans, amid reports of bounties
for their capture.
The rebel leadership in the eastern city
of Benghazi says it is working on a post-Gadhafi reconciliation plan.
But details are fuzzy and rebel leaders often resort to platitudes when
dismissing suggestions of discord, saying simply that "Libya is one tribe."
On Edge in Libya
Track the latest events in Libya.View Interactive
Regional Upheaval
Track events day by day in the region.View Interactive
That viewpoint could prove dangerously naive.
Already the fighting has fanned historic feuds and created new fault
lines across the country. In the Nafusa Mountains southwest of Tripoli,
rebels from the Zintan tribe are now pitted against their old rivals the
Mashashya, who are mostly pro-government.
In a bid to calm some of these tensions, Libya's former colonial
ruler Italy, which is siding with the rebels, announced last week it
would host almost 300 Libyan tribal leaders for a major reconciliation conference, an offer quickly ridiculed by the Gadhafi regime.
"The longer this [fighting] goes on, the more it reinforces deep
mistrust across all social cleavages," said Lisa Anderson, president of
the American University in Cairo who is a Libya expert.
Misrata's rebels succeeded last month in pushing Col. Gadhafi's forces out of the city,
but they continue to struggle in battles on three fronts including the
border with Tawergha. A teenage boy was killed Monday and six of his
relatives were wounded, including his parents and siblings, said
witnesses, when pro-regime forces on the city's outskirts fired rockets
into Misrata. Since Friday, similar attacks in the area have killed two
women and at least 26 rebels, including ten on Monday, doctors said.
Though the rebel's political leadership says it will take steps to
avoid reprisals if they capture the town, others are calling for the
expulsion of Tawerghans from the area.
Ibrahim al-Halbous, a rebel commander leading the fight near
Tawergha, says all remaining residents should leave once if his fighters
capture the town. "They should pack up," Mr. Halbous said. "Tawergha
no longer exists, only Misrata."
It is unclear how many families still live in Tawergha, which has
turned into staging grounds for government troops. Many are believed to
be in a government-administered camp in al-Haisha farther south.
Other rebel leaders are also calling for drastic measures like
banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their
children to schools in Misrata.
The hatred of Tawergha stems from witnesses who say loyalist soldiers
were accompanied by hundreds of volunteer fighters from Tawergha when
they ransacked and burned dozens of properties in an assault against
Misrata and surrounding areas on March 16 to 18.
There are also accounts of rape, with one rebel commander putting the
number at more than 150, but they are harder to prove given the stigma
attached to the crime in the conservative muslim nation and the lack of
testimony.
Some of the hatred of Tawergha has racist overtones that were mostly
latent before the current conflict. On the road between Misrata and
Tawergha, rebel slogans like "the brigade for purging slaves, black
skin" have supplanted pro-Gadhafi scrawl.
The racial tensions have been fueled by the regime's alleged use of
African mercenaries to violently suppress demonstrators at the start of
the Libyan uprising in February, and the sense that the south of the
country, which is predominantly black, mainly backs Col. Gadhafi.
Bashir Amer says he was one of the victims of the assault on Misrata
by loyalist soldiers and Tawerghans in March. Nothing was spared on his
ranch, he said, in the farmland area of Tuminah on the road between
Misrata and Tawergha.
The carcass of one of Mr. Amer's Thoroughbred horses was still baking
in the sun during a recent visit. His farmhouse was set on fire after
all valuables were looted, Mr. Amer said as he held up his wife's empty
jewelry box. He stood in the master bedroom, which was reduced to
incinerated walls and a carpet of ash.
Mr. Amer said he was having breakfast with his family when soldiers
jumped over the farm's fence and started shooting indiscriminately,
wounding his daughter Fatima, 16, in the leg.
Mr. Amer said they were then allowed to go to his parents' ranch
farther up the road in nearby Karzaz opening the way for pro-Gadhafi
volunteers from Tawergha, who eventually reached his parents' farm.
There, he said all were led out before the house, like his own, was
looted and set on fire. "It was terrifying when the Tawergha men came
into my parents' house," Mr. Amer said.
His father and six cousins and their families were detained during
the same raid on Tuminah and Karzaz. They remain missing along with more
than 1,000 other Misrata residents.
The Amers, like their wealthy neighbors the Issas, have been accused
by the regime of bankrolling the rebels, which they admit to doing.
Standing on the roof of his family's burned out farmhouse, Tareq Issa
recalls their escape after his uncle was killed and brother gravely
wounded in a shootout with Gadhafi loyalists who attacked the farm. The
Issas came back to Tuminah last month to find their properties in ruins.
The incinerated body of a Lexus sedan sat in the garage of one
mansion while a smashed marble urn was all that remained of the contents
of another Tuscan-style villa nestled amid acres of orchards.
Mr. Issa, a lawyer who now leads a clutch of fighters in charge of
security in Tuminah, blames Tawerghans for the attack and said his whole
clan has scores to settle with the town.
Write to Sam Dagher at sam.dagher@wsj.com
4. US Conference of Mayors Says No More War Funding
Mayors Tell Congress: Bring War Dollars Home
By Lisa Savage
BALTIMORE, June 20 – Mayors from around the world met in Baltimore
this week to set public policy for the billions of people living in
big cities, depending on municipal services to stay safe. While
Congress considered allocating another $118 billion to conduct wars
next year – and President Obama absurdly maintained that the costly
bombing of Libya is not an act of war, and thus not subject to
Congressional oversight – mayors listened to the people.
Following a lively debate about adding stronger language supporting
troops and their families, and adding President Obama as a
recipient, mayors voted in their June 20 plenary session to call on
the federal government to stop funding wars, and bring the money
home.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors' Resolution Number 59 was only a
twinkle in the eye two years ago when a coalition of citizens
alarmed at endless wars and catastrophic budget shortfalls coined
the slogan “Bring Our War Dollars Home” at activist Sally Breen's
kitchen table in Winthrop, Maine. That state's campaign took off on
Martin Luther King Jr. Day in 2010, and soon spread nationally with
adoption by the women-led peace group CODEPINK. Locations across
Maine soon adopted war dollars home resolutions, including Deer
Isle, Portland, and School Administrative District #74, followed by
Northampton and Amherst, Massachusetts and, most recently, by
Hartford, Connecticut.
Meanwhile, Congress continued to pass war funding supplemental
bills, but without the support of Maine's two representatives in the
House. Rep. Mike Michaud (D-2nd) and Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-1st)
defied Democrat party leadership to repeatedly vote no on the
measures. Pingree began speaking out in Congress and in the press
about the need to listen to her constituents' demands to end the
wars as Maine's economy unraveled, and local budgets for education,
health care, housing and job training were slashed.
In March CODEPINK brought on board national campaign manager C.J.
Minster, who wrote the text of the mayors' resolution at another
kitchen table, that of co-founder Medea Benjamin. The idea to bring
a resolution to the annual conference of mayors had been proposed to
co-founder Jodie Evans by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa,
the incoming president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
The conference first convened in 1932, as big city mayors came
together in Detroit to consider what could be done to pull their
troubled cities out of the depths of the Great Depression. The New
Deal incorporated many of their ideas, and mayors have met annually
ever since.
"The United States Conference of Mayors calls on the U.S. Congress
to bring these war dollars home to meet vital human needs, promote
job creation, rebuild our infrastructure, aid municipal and state
governments, and develop a new economy based upon renewable,
sustainable energy," the resolution reads, citing the $126 billion a
year cost of U.S. wars and the deaths of more than 6,000 troops.
Mayor Joanne Twomey of Biddeford, Maine spoke out about the current
recession last April when her city council was forced to drastically
reduce spending on K-12 education. At a rally at the State House in
Augusta, Maine Public Radio reported: "As mayor of the city of
Biddeford – we are cutting $1.6 million in our education budget, and
last week I had had it – I'm starting to say it from the podium,"
said Twomey. "It's my responsibility as mayor of the city of
Biddeford to start saying if our priorities were straight, if we
could bring these war dollars home, I wouldn't have to be doing
this, and neither would the Biddeford school board."
Kitty Piercy, Mayor of Eugene, Oregon, took the lead by introducing
Resolution 59 stating: “Mayors call on our country to begin the
journey of turning war dollars back into peace dollars, of bringing
our loved ones home and of focusing our national resources on
building security and prosperity here at home. Our children and
families long for and call for a real investment in the future of
America. It is past due.”
Piercy was joined in supporting the measure by mayors from
Worcester, Hartford, Baltimore, and a score of other cities. States
represented on the endorsement list included Virginia, Florida,
Ohio, New York, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, and Wisconsin. The
resolution flew through the Metro Economies Committee on the opening
day of the mayors' conference, and the news was picked up by media
outlets all over the world. On Sunday, June 19, Mayor Villaraigosa
spoke in favor of the resolution on television current affairs
program Meet The Press – and the rest is history.
As for who will enforce the non-binding resolution, that is up to
the people. Grassroots pressure to end funding for wars eventually
produced an end to U.S. military presence in Vietnam, presaged by
the last time the mayors considered a war dollars home resolution in
1971. Mayors may very well be closer to the will of the people than
are senators or presidents. The framers of our Constitution seemed
to recognize this when they put the power of the purse in the hands
of the branch of government supposed to be closest to the people,
the House of Representatives.
Immense profits by weapons manufacturers – and the jobs that depend
upon war funding – are compelling reasons for wars with vague goals
and shifting targets to continue indefinitely. Corporations spend
millions lobbying Congress while contriving to pay no income taxes.
Many citizens are questioning who the federal government really
represents.
President Obama said while campaigning that he was not against all
wars, just stupid wars. Bankrupting the country to maintain 800+
military bases abroad, and drop bombs costing $1 million apiece –
the equivalent of 25 teachers' annual salaries – could be the
definition of stupid in the 21st Century. Fellow Democrat Rep. John
Garamedi of California warned this week, “If the president doesn’t
move…he will face a revolution in Congress…It’s coming to that.”
If the President has forgotten that Afghanistan is called “the
graveyard of empires,” the people have not. Their mayors now join
the chorus calling on the federal government to end endless wars,
and bring the war dollars home.
##
Lisa Savage is CODEPINK's Local Coordinator for Maine, and an active
organizer with the Bring Our War $$ Home campaign. For more
information wardollarshome.org.
5. Eyewitness Libya Fundraising Tour in DC tonight; we will get an update on and talk about today's Congressional action
WHEN: Friday, June 24th at 7:00 pm
WHERE: The Festival Center @ 1640 Columbia Road, Washington, DC
JUST: four blocks four blocks from Columbia Heights Metro, Green and Yellow Lines
WHERE: The Festival Center @ 1640 Columbia Road, Washington, DC
JUST: four blocks four blocks from Columbia Heights Metro, Green and Yellow Lines
6. Americans Turn Against Libya War
June 24, 2011
Americans Shift to More Negative View of Libya Military Action
Now more likely to disapprove than approve
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON,
NJ -- Americans are more likely to say they disapprove than approve of
the U.S. military action in Libya. That represents a shift from three
months ago, just after the mission began, when approval exceeded
disapproval.
The results are based on a Gallup poll conducted June 22. The House
of Representatives is set to vote on resolutions that would limit the
U.S. role in Libya, partly because of questions about whether the
mission violates the War Powers Act since President Obama did not obtain
congressional authorization for it. The U.S. sent forces to Libya in
March as part of a multinational force to protect rebels in that country
from attacks by Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi.
Democrats are the only political group to show more support for than
opposition to the U.S. involvement. Independents are the most likely to
show opposition, with a majority disapproving.
Republicans' opinions have changed the most since March, moving to
39% approval from 57%. This likely reflects increased criticism of the
mission's legality and cost from some Republican congressional leaders
and presidential candidates. Independents' views have become slightly
more negative over the last three months, while Democrats' opinions have
been largely stable.
Opposition Mainly Because of Substance, Rather Than Legality, of Military Operation
The poll sought to explore Americans' reasons for opposition to the
operation by asking those who disapprove whether they disagree with the
substance of the policy or with how it was executed. Most who
disapprove, 64%, do so because they do not think the U.S. should be in
Libya at all. Just under a third, 29%, disapprove because they do not
think the president obtained the necessary approval from Congress to
conduct the operation.
Supporters View Gadhafi Removal as Ultimate Goal
The stated goal of the military operation was to protect Libyan
citizens from attacks by the country's government, but the obvious
question is whether the ultimate goal should be removal of the
government, namely, President Gadhafi, from power. The poll asked those
who approve of the mission whether the U.S. action should continue until
Gadhafi is removed from power, and the vast majority, 85%, agree.
Implications
Gallup found initial support for the U.S. mission in Libya low compared with other recent U.S. military engagements.
As the operation continues into its fourth month, and with increased
criticism of the effort from political leaders, it is not surprising
that support for it has eroded. It is still unclear whether Congress
will ultimately limit the mission in Libya or authorize it to continue.
The president's Wednesday announcement of troop withdrawals from
Afghanistan shows he is sensitive to pressure to scale down U.S.
military operations abroad as the U.S. struggles to improve the economy
and get the federal budget deficit under control.
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews
conducted June 22, 2011, on the Gallup Daily tracking survey, with a
random sample of 999 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S.
states and the District of Columbia.
For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say
with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4
percentage points.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and
cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents
who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample includes a minimum quota
of 400 cell phone respondents and 600 landline respondents per 1,000
national adults, with additional minimum quotas among landline
respondents for gender within region. Landline telephone numbers are
chosen at random among listed telephone numbers. Cell phone numbers are
selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are
chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had
the most recent birthday.
Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity,
education, region, adults in the household, and phone status (cell phone
only/landline only/both, cell phone mostly, and having an unlisted
landline number). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March
2010 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older
non-institutionalized population living in U.S. telephone households.
All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design
effects for weighting and sample design.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the
findings of public opinion polls.
Polls conducted entirely in one day, such as this one, are subject to
additional error or bias not found in polls conducted over several
days.
For more details on Gallup's polling methodology, visit www.gallup.com.
W.E. A.L.L. B.E. Radio: We Want Freedom Now! Cynthia McKinney Live!
--
Silence is the deadliest weapon of mass destruction.
______________________________
Updates mailing list
Updates@lists.
http://lists.
More Sis. Cynthia McKinney On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.:
http://weallbe.blogspot.com/search?q=CYNTHIA+MCKINNEY
*W.E. A.L.L. B.E. News & Radio Special*
The Honorable Sis. Cynthia McKinney Tribute Show!!!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2008/08/03/Tha-Artivist-PresentsWE-ALL-BE-News-Radio
The Honorable Sis. Cynthia McKinney Tribute Show!!!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2008/08/03/Tha-Artivist-PresentsWE-ALL-BE-News-Radio
No comments:
Post a Comment