Monday, March 29, 2010

Black Farmers Blame Obama For Failed Settlement

John Boyd Speaking With Alabama Gubernatorial Candidate Artur Davis In Montgomery Alabama, 2/10/2010
 Black Farmers Blame Obama For Failed Settlement
Fri, Mar 26 2010

By Jasmin Melvin

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration dropped the ball on a $1.25 billion deal to settle decades-old discrimination lawsuits with black farmers, an advocate for the group said on Friday after the government failed to meet a key deadline.

The deal, one of the largest civil rights settlements in history, was to compensate black farmers left out of federal farm loan and assistance programs due to racism.

But it was contingent on Congress approving $1.15 billion in funding by March 31. Lawmakers left for a two-week break on Friday without approving the deal, leaving it in limbo.

"The president made a strong commitment to show leadership to get this done, and basically we haven't seen him show that leadership," said John Boyd Jr., head of the National Black Farmers Association.

"The president didn't help us finish the job," Boyd said.

The deal reached last month was hailed by President Barack Obama, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, and Attorney General Eric Holder as a milestone in righting historic wrongs.

The farmers had urged the administration to declare the settlement an emergency, which would waive Congress from the so-called "pay-go" requirement to trim budgets for other programs to fund the payments.

The 2008 Farm Bill had provided for $100 million in payments. Boyd and key lawmakers met with Vilsack this week in a last-ditch effort to get the waiver for the rest.

Vilsack told reporters the administration was working through complex legal and jurisdictional issues, in part because of rules established in the Farm Bill.

"There is absolutely no hesitation on the part of this administration," Vilsack said. "We want to get these cases resolved and we will."

The missed deadline for the case, known as Pigford II, will mean black farmers face more financial hardships, Boyd said.

The original Pigford class action lawsuit, named after North Carolina farmer Timothy Pigford, was settled in 1999 after the USDA ignored black farmers' claims for decades.

In the first case, more than 13,000 farmers received payments in a package worth more than $1 billion.

But tens of thousands of farmers missed the filing deadline. The settlement in Pigford II would allow these farmers to again make their claims.

Boyd said he will now go back to his lawyers to determine whether the funding deadline can be pushed back.

The lawsuit originally sought $2.5 billion. The smaller settlement was accepted primarily because "the administration agreed to put this on the fast track," Boyd said, noting many of the farmers were elderly and had urgent need for the money.

Boyd said he has asked for a meeting with President Obama to get answers.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi both are committed to working with Obama to conclude the case, spokespersons said.

Vilsack added the USDA would continue to work on the issue during Congress' absence. "Our hope is that as soon as Congress returns that we'll get it done," he said.

© Thomson Reuters 2010. All rights reserved. 

See More On W.E. A.L.L. B.E. :

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Why Pope Benedict Must Resign

Why Pope Benedict Must Resign
Editor’s Note: Before becoming Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was best known for resisting liberalization of Catholic Church orthodoxy. He was a staunch enemy of reforms that would have given women greater power within the Church, softened the hostility toward adult homosexuality, and abandoned the insistence on clerical celibacy.

Yet, while guarding the Vatican gates against forces of modernity, Cardinal Ratzinger also was covering up the global scandal of priests sexually abusing boys, a failure that – in the eyes of Marquette Professor of Moral Theology Daniel C. Maguire – now requires the pope to submit his resignation:

See Also On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.:

Justice Thomas, Your Wife Is On The Docket

Justice Thomas, Your Wife Is On The Docket
The Bonds Between Husbands And Wives Will Always Affect How These Men And Women Behave In Their Public Lives. That Is Why I’m Perfectly Comfortable With Suggesting That Clarence Thomas Remove Himself From Several Supreme Court Cases In The Coming Term.

By Jason Johnson
Published on 03/25/2010


Everyone would like to believe that even if your boss’s wife doesn’t like you that it wouldn’t affect your performance evaluation. We also want to believe that if our best friend’s husband owns a struggling Ford dealership that she won’t be mad when we drive up in a new Hyundai. But deep down, we all know this is not the case. The bonds between husbands and wives will always affect how these men and women behave in their public lives. That is why I’m perfectly comfortable with suggesting that Clarence Thomas remove himself from several Supreme Court cases in the coming term.

Last week it was announced that Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, Justice Thomas’ wife, was starting her own official offshoot of the Tea Party movement called “Liberty Central Inc.” The conservative group will help get the country back on track, and away from the brink of tyranny, by raising a lot of money from conservative activists and sharing information on how the Obama administration is out of control. Virginia Thomas has a history of conservative activism for many years. So while this is not a radical change for her, the creation of such a public group creates a huge conflict of interest for her husband.

During the last State of the Union address President Obama publicly chastised the Supreme Court for their ruling in the “Citizens United” case. In “Citizens United” the Court ruled that private businesses and organizations could now spend unlimited amounts of money during political campaigns. And now Justice Thomas’s wife is starting an organization that will be able to raise unlimited funds to promote their cause without having to reveal any of the donors or the size of their contributions. Thomas is a conservative, and he ruled on this case prior to his wife’s new political adventure.

There is, however, no doubt that Virginia Thomas running an organization with a “Tea Party” agenda associates Justice Thomas with policies and potential rulings that bring his objectivity into question. When his wife’s organization is dependent on the ability to raise and spend funds without limitation do you think that Thomas will rule objectively when Citizens United is eventually challenged? Or rule objectively on any other case dealing with their political agenda? In recent years, conservatives on the court have demonstrated a willingness to skirt the spirit of conflict of interest.

During the Bush vs. Gore recount case in 2000, Justice Antonin Scalia conveniently forgot to mention that TWO of his sons were working for law firms that represented the Bush administration. He claimed that since they weren’t directly involved in Bush vs. Gore he felt no need to share that information. Nice cover, but that didn’t pass the smell test with many appeals judges who felt Scalia was not being forthcoming with the public or the court.

During that same case, Justice Thomas’s wife, Virginia, was working for the pro-Bush conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation and was soliciting resumes from Republican Congressional staffers for ‘transition jobs’ with the new administration. Somehow this too was deemed OK and Thomas chose not to remove himself from the case.

Any suggestion – whether through sons, daughters or wives – that the justices can be influenced by outside sources should be removed so as to at least maintain the image that the court is impartial. Yes, this may put a slight burden on the spouses of Justices, but that’s a small public price to pay for the private influence they all exhibit on American’s lives.

If Virginia Thomas is really that desperate to take a stand on an issue, she should take a hint from Michelle Obama. I am sure that the most important issue to the First Lady is not childhood obesity, but she’s become a champion of an issue that in no way can negatively impact her husband’s professional duties. Virginia Thomas, you should be taking notes.

(Dr. Jason Johnson is an associate professor of political science and communications at Hiram College in Ohio, where he teaches courses in campaigns and elections, pop culture, and the politics of sports. He can be reached at johnsonja@hiram.edu.)

More Jason Johnson On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.:

School The Boys On Domestic Violence


School The Boys On Domestic Violence

Tony
Nichelson

This commentary is written to bring greater awareness of domestic violence issues to parents, coaches, mentors and anyone else who cares enough to help young men break the cycle of violence in their homes. The issue of domestic violence is taboo in almost every segment of our society and culture, yet it touches so many lives every day. Young boys see their mothers, aunts and sisters violated by abusive men, and are often unable to help the women they love fight off these brutes.

The long-term impact on these boys is significant, however, and the retaliatory feelings they have can carry on for decades. The result is often a repeated cycle of violence in their own adulthoods, or a serious hatred for any man who looks like their mother’s tormentor. The boys are angry with their mothers for allowing this creep to stay in the home, and they’re angry with the men for being so outrageous. The boys are angry with themselves for not being able to do more, and they’re angry with society for allowing such behaviors to go on, seemingly unchecked.

Against a backdrop of violence within our society, including violent videos, violence on prime time TV shows, violence on the news, and violence in the conversations they have with each other, urban boys have all thought of hitting or stomping a young rival. They have nearly all performed a wrestling move while playing, and there are heated moments (even fights) during playground sporting competitions. Boys are naturally aggressive, and when that aggression links up with stupidity, you will have unwarranted violence.

Urban boys also have a loose understanding of “the pimp game,” where women are a mere commodity, jewelry and cash are measures of success, cars are the primary status symbol, and bravado is the juice that keeps it all going. Pimps hit their women, ostensibly to control them, but mostly because this is the nature of the “game.”

Violence and misogyny go hand-in-hand, and young boys see so many examples of these twin evils, even before they enter junior high.

As I drive around town, sometimes near the end of a school day, I see hundreds of children walking home, frolicking, and engaged in animated conversations. Occasionally, I come upon a fight between young boys, but all too frequently, I see a boy fighting with a girl. This was the lowest form of masculinity when I was growing up. You certainly didn’t want to lose a fight to a girl, and boys were trained not to hit girls.

The hip-hop artist T-Payne has been in the news lately because of some really raunchy lyrics and videos, and a truly degrading television show that I didn’t see. I tend to blame hip-hop moguls and marketers for nearly all of the ills and ignorance affecting urban boys today. But domestic violence has its roots in virtually all socio-economic influences on urban children. It is socially acceptable to denigrate women and girls, and it is now normal for a segment of urban boys to curse and disrespect female teachers, parents, siblings, girlfriends, and ultimately, their future wives.

Men should never hit women; boys should never hit girls.

We must begin to train our boys to protect the women in their lives, including their mothers, sisters, aunts and girlfriends. Boys have to be trained that their anger should never be violently directed toward females.

The 110 Institute recently launched a full-scale domestic violence prevention Campaign for 2010. The core of the initiative is to support the work of the YWCA Abused Women’s program and Emergency Shelter, along with the work of the Exchange Club, and any other domestic violence prevention effort. The 2010 campaign trains young boys to protect the women and girls around them, and advocates for legislation that puts teeth into protective orders filed against violent men. We recommend that all women master basic self-defense, and that we establish “distress signals” for women who literally can’t get away from their abuser for even five-minutes. But mostly, we have to break the cycle of urban boys seeing abuse and violence early in their lives, and then turning out to be abusers themselves, due largely to unresolved anger toward their mothers and the abusive men they chose to be involved with.

If we don’t begin to educate urban boys in elementary school about domestic violence prevention, we will continue to grow a very dangerous crop of men who have no regard for the sanctity of womanhood, and there will be few – if any – eligible men for the next generation of your daughters to marry. 



(Anthony Nichelson is program director for the Citadel Radio Group and founder of the 110 Institute. 
anthony.nichelson@citcomm.com
110tasks@americamail.com)

More Anthony Nichelson On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.:
http://weallbe.blogspot.com/search?q=anthony+nichelson


***W.E. A.L.L. B.E. Radio Special***
Beyond The Mask: Uncovering The Truth About Domestic Violence 
Mid-South Men's Forum Preview Show:

Differences Aside, New ‘Men’s Forum’ Ready To Tackle Solutions:
http://weallbe.blogspot.com/2010/01/differences-aside-new-mens-forum-ready.html


April 13, 2008~The State Of Black America Part One*


April 20, 2008~The State Of Black America Part Two

April 27, 2008~The State Of Black America Part Three



W.E. A.L.L. B.E. News & Radio Special: Yes He Did...So Now What??? Defining The Obama Presidency...
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2008/11/16/Tha-Artivist-PresentsWE-ALL-BE-News-Radio


The Audacity To Adopt


The Audacity To Adopt

by Wendell F. Phillips
NNPA Guest Commentary

(NNPA) - The recent tragedy in Haiti has no doubt seized our attention while simultaneously tugging at our heart and purse strings. And rightfully so. As I watched the news reports and looked at the devastation I began to wonder … what will happen to the Black children who have lost all they have ever known … including their parents?

Well, is it just me or is anyone else noticing the apparent absence of Black couples adopting these displaced Haitian children? I figure that most of these children and adoption cases were already in the pipeline and the conditions since the earthquake have helped expedite things. But, they make it seem like you can just go to the store, sign a paper and they will deliver your little Haitian child “within 7-10 business days or if you are an Amazon Prime customer you can get him or her overnight”! Of course I’m being facetious and the issue is indeed a serious one but if my eyes and the media aren’t deceiving me, a few questions for us all to ponder rush to mind:

1) Why aren’t any Black folk shown adopting these Haitian children?
2) Why are White folk so quick to adopt these Haitian children?
3) Why aren’t more folk from any group adopting the Black children from the foster care system right here in America?

Each question begets yet another but to be fair this issue of adoption has been around for decades and Black children right here in America could use some love.

Note to Reader: For the record, this writer sees the issue of race in just about everything. Of course I am aware of and recognize all people of color but my default is Black & White. Over the years that has been the most volatile and contentious relationship.

And if we get that one right, the others will be a piece of cake. In fact, whenever I am accused of “playing the Race Card “, I always let folk know that I didn’t deal the hand. It has been my experience that if you ask “why?” long enough eventually it will come down to race.

And if it is between or amongst people of the same color, Class becomes the issue. But we can argue about that in another post at another time.

It would seem that White folk are comfortable as can be adopting children of any color, from anywhere – Asia, India, Haiti, Africa. Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt, Madonna come to mind most immediately. But what’s wrong with the Black children that grew up right here in America; the little Black children born here in our cities; the little Black children who live in group homes that none of us seem to want in our neighborhoods; with parents who were born here … but for whatever reason couldn’t handle raising such a gift?

With instances such as these it’s tough to holler ''race'' because Black folk make it easy for White folk to say, “Forget it”. I have heard Black folk say, “Who do they think they are? How are White folks going to raise Black children? They have no idea what it’s like to be Black”! And maybe they don’t … but they don’t know what it’s like to be Asian, Indian, Haitian or African either. And wouldn’t a better question be centered on whether or not the adopters were emotionally, physically and financially able to provide a loving home for the adoptees? Or another question is why aren’t the people asking adopting?

Some have gone so far as to compare this scenario of White folk adopting Black children as sort of a soft genocide, if you will. For the record, this writer happens to find that declaration a wee bit dramatic though I understand the thinking that brings the opponents to this conclusion.

In its 1994 position paper entitled, ''Preserving Families of African Ancestry'', The National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW) makes the following assertion:
''Transracial adoption of an African-American child should only be considered after documented evidence of unsuccessful same race placements has been reviewed and supported by appropriate representatives of the African-American community''.

Proponents of transracial adoption believe this represents a somewhat softer point of view, claiming that the NABSWs 1972 stance came closer to the soft genocide statement.

Nevertheless the point is the NABSW suggests that Black children adjust/develop/respond better with Black families. That sounds sound. But let’s look at some numbers in an article from www.adoption.com :
“Opponents of race matching contend that the numbers now seem stacked against the possibility of same-race adoptions. Of the estimated 500,000 children in the U.S. foster home system, more than half are minorities.

Of those available for adoption, 40 percent are Black, although Blacks represent only about 13 percent of the general population. What is more, according to the National Adoption Center, which keeps track of so-called hard-to-place children, about 67 percent of such children are Black and 26 percent are White, while 67 percent of the waiting families are White and 31 percent are Black.”

Now I am sure there will be those who will read this and say, ''My family adopts ... in fact, they adopted me!'' and they will go down a list that reads like that fifth chapter of Genesis in the Bible inserting ''adopt'' for every ''begat''. And while that is good for that particular family, that family and those like it are the exception and not the rule. So if you are among those who feel I am ''preaching to the choir'', based on the aforementioned numbers, I humbly submit that the choir ain't singin'!

In the passage quoted above it would appear that we will soon have far more Black children needing to be adopted right here in America and not enough Black families to adopt them all. So who picks up the slack? Is it better for them to grow up devoid of many cultural customs or do we leave them to languish until they age out of a troubled foster care system feeling more and more unworthy as years go by? Or am I oversimplifying?

Beyond the issues already discussed I am sure there are economic factors to consider as well. Adopting is an intense, expensive endeavor and the legal process is as lengthy as it is costly. I have often wondered about adoption. Could I make a difference?Sure. Could I handle it financially?

Less sure. But perhaps somebody out there is ready and this is just the catalyst they need to begin to get the process started. Maybe there are those out there who don’t have kids or for whatever reason are unable to conceive. Maybe you have enough love, energy and desire stored up in your home. Go ahead … make a difference … I dare ya!

On W.E. A.L.L. B.E. Radio:
2010 State Of The Black Union
“It Ain’t About Tavis, It’s About Us, & It's About Time!”
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2010/02/25/tha-artivist-presentswe-all-be-radio


See also...

Mid-South Men's Forum Preview Show:

Differences Aside, New ‘Men’s Forum’ Ready To Tackle Solutions:
http://weallbe.blogspot.com/2010/01/differences-aside-new-mens-forum-ready.html


April 13, 2008~The State Of Black America Part One*


April 20, 2008~The State Of Black America Part Two

April 27, 2008~The State Of Black America Part Three



W.E. A.L.L. B.E. News & Radio Special: Yes He Did...So Now What??? Defining The Obama Presidency...
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2008/11/16/Tha-Artivist-PresentsWE-ALL-BE-News-Radio



W.E. A.L.L. B.E. Song Of The Month: "Keep Movin' On" By Sam Cooke


Video: Sam Cooke - Keep Movin' On


Keep Movin' On

Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
life is this way
Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
everyday

When I go to sleep at night
I add up my day
trying to recall the things I done
and debts I have to pay
for there is one thing that I know
what you reap is what you sow

Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
life is this way
Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
everyday

Brother mind what you do
and how your treat your fellow man
if you're like me you'd try to live
the very best you can
for if you spread good all around
you'd be able to sleep when the sun goes down

Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
life is this way
Keep movin' on, keep movin' on
everyday

March 31st Deadline Approaching For Black Farmers’ Settlement

John Boyd, John Conyers and House Judiciary Attny Keenan Keller
By Kevin Bogardus - 03/24/10 03:45 PM ET
www.thehill.com

Lawmakers from both chambers on Wednesday pressed the administration to help find funds to resolve black farmers’ longstanding discrimination claims against the Agriculture Department (USDA).

March 31 is the deadline the Obama administration and Congress set to fund a new $1.25 billion settlement, according to its agreed-upon terms. But a week away from the deadline, Capitol Hill has not moved on funding for the settlement.

Reps. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and Robert “Bobby” Scott (D-Va.) and Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) made a public plea Wednesday to find the money to resolve the discrimination claims.

Lawmakers said the administration needs to step in so Congress can move forward on the appropriations request. Conyers and others said the administration has to designate the settlement funding as an emergency so Capitol Hill can waive pay-go rules and attach it to legislation.

“Do we need anything else?” Conyers asked the crowd gathered at the press conference.

The member then decided to take the matter into his own hands. After calling Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack’s office on an aide’s cell phone from the press conference, Conyers scored an impromptu meeting with the Cabinet official Wednesday.

“Put Vilsack on speaker,” Conyers said as an aide brought over his cell phone while television cameras rolled.

Standing at the House Triangle podium with reporters watching, the powerful House Judiciary Committee chairman sorted out the particulars of when a meeting could take place. “You realize this is urgent,” he said on the phone.

Learning that the Agriculture secretary was on his way to the White House, Conyers said he could meet him there.

“I don’t want a phone conversation. I want to meet him in person,” Conyers said.

After hanging up, the Michigan Democrat said, “Jesus. Government employees.”

Aides to Conyers later confirmed that the lawmaker had scored his meeting with Vilsack. Conyers is expected to meet with the Cabinet secretary later Wednesday at his office in the Rayburn Building.

A USDA spokesman said Vilsack is actively looking for funding to resolve the claims.

“USDA is actively working with Congress to find the resources needed to fulfill the Pigford settlement agreement. In recent weeks, Agriculture Secretary Vilsack has made personal phone calls and sent a letter in support of the president’s budget amendment, and he has urged Congress to appropriate the resources to resolve this important matter,” said the spokesman.

The settlement’s $1.25 billion consists of $100 million already appropriated in the 2008 Farm Bill as well as the administration’s 2011 budget request of $1.15 billion.

President Barack Obama was vital in getting the $100 million for black farmers in the Farm Bill when he was Illinois’s junior senator.

The brash move by Conyers won approval from John Boyd Jr., president of the National Black Farmers Association, who has lobbied for resolution of the discrimination claims for years.

“It’s good that he is calling him out on the rug,” Boyd said.

Despite only a few legislative days until the Easter recess, Boyd was confident that lawmakers could act if given the green light from the administration.

“They can attach this to the next moving train,” Boyd said. “It is very doable.”

There is a possibility the settlement’s deadline could be extended past March 31, giving Congress more time to find the necessary funding. But Boyd said black farmers cannot be asked to wait any longer and deferring compensation yet again would disrupt another planting season.

“I don’t want an extension. I want Congress to act,” Boyd said. “Honestly, I don’t want to go through that process.”

***

Black Farmers' $1.25 Billion Deal May Fall Through
Wed, Mar 24 2010

By Jasmin Melvin

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Black farmers are worried that a landmark deal to compensate them for discrimination faced over decades could slip through their fingers as a deadline looms without funding approved by lawmakers.

Last month, the Obama administration announced a $1.25 billion settlement with black farmers left out of loan and assistance programs administered by the U.S. Agriculture Department due to racism, one of the largest civil rights settlements in U.S. history.

But the deal was contingent on Congressional approval by March 31. Lawmakers leave on Friday for a two-week break, and there is no clear sign the funds will be approved by then.

Missing the deadline "would mean missing another planting season, more black farmers going out of business, more black farmers dying waiting for justice," said John Boyd Jr, head of the National Black Farmers Association.

The USDA's decision to settle without the money to back up the deal may require Boyd, the government and all of the law firms involved in the case to go back to the bargaining table if the March 31 deadline is not met.

"The reason we took the settlement was because we thought they were going to act swiftly," Boyd said.

But a last-ditch meeting with Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and key appropriators and lawmakers on Capitol Hill late on Wednesday gave Boyd some optimism about the looming deadline.

"I don't think Secretary Vilsack would want to walk away from the deal," Boyd said after the meeting. "He seems sincere."

He hopes the administration will declare the settlement an emergency, which would waive Congress from the so-called "pay-go" requirement to trim budgets for other programs to fund the settlement.

The deal, known as Pigford II, was reached with the Justice Department and USDA on February 18. About $100 million had already been approved.

The original Pigford class-action lawsuit, named after North Carolina farmer Timothy Pigford, was filed against the USDA in 1997 after decades of the department not responding to black farmers' claims of discrimination.

It was settled two years later with more than 13,000 farmers receiving monetary awards and debt relief worth more than $1 billion.

But tens of thousands of farmers missed the filing deadline so their claims were denied. The new settlement would allow these farmers to again make their claims.

(Reporting by Jasmin Melvin; Editing by Richard Chang)

© Thomson Reuters 2010. All rights reserved.

***


Written by: BayouBuzz Staff

U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu, D-La., today joined the National Black Farmers Association (NBFA) in calling on Congress to swiftly approve President Obama’s request for $1.15 billion to fund a 1999 court settlement compensating African-American farmers for racial discrimination claims against the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA). In Louisiana, 985 farmers have filed an eligible claim.

The $1.15 billion request is part of the supplemental appropriations bill Congress is expected to consider in the coming weeks.

“This settlement isn’t just about correcting past wrongs – it is about ensuring future prosperity,” said Sen. Landrieu. “These funds will help our black farmers stave off the current economic downturn and survive in the face of constant rain and storms that have crippled Louisiana’s agriculture community.

“Now is the time for Congress to end the 12-year delay and approve this settlement as quickly as possible. Nearly a thousand African-American farmers in Louisiana have waited for too long for this compensation. The finish line is in sight, and I commend John Boyd and the National Black Farmers Association for their tireless efforts in getting us to this point.”

For decades, the government blatantly discriminated against African-American farmers by denying them loans that were awarded to their white counterparts. In 1999, the USDA settled a class-action lawsuit which compensated approximately 15,000 African-American farmers. The compensation per farmer was about $50,000.

In 2008, the Food Conservation and Energy Act included a provision to re-open the case to allow late filers. The supplemental appropriations bill will ensure that these disputes are finally settled, putting an end to the 12-year waiting period.

There are 1,914 African-American farmers in Louisiana.

(Senator Landrieu Press Release)
See More On W.E. A.L.L. B.E. :

Richard Pryor’s Designated Writer: An Interview With Paul Mooney

Video: SNL Word Association Skit Featuring Richard Pryor & Chevy Chase


Richard Pryor’s Designated Writer: An Interview With Paul Mooney

[26 March 2010]
By Steve Ryfle
www.popmatters.com

Paul Mooney remembers discovering the raw political power of the n-word. As a young comic honing his craft during the ‘60s—a time when stand-up was undergoing a revitalizing transformation from punchlines to monologues—Mooney and his better-known best friend, one Richard Franklin Lennox Thomas Pryor III, seized control of America’s ugliest racial epithet and wielded it as a comic weapon.

“When Richard and I use it on stage in front of an audience with both white and black folks in it, we are saying something that white people can’t,” Mooney says in his memoir Black Is the New White (Simon Spotlight, $24.95). “It’s forbidden to them, but allowed to us. Ain’t too many things like that. It’s liberating.”

For decades now, Mooney has been doing the seemingly impossible: turning racism into comic fodder. Casual observers will recognize him as the comedian who renounced the n-word after Michael Richards’ racist onstage freakout in 2006 (even urging all African-American performers to delete it from their vocabulary), as the creator of Homey D. Clown for In Living Color and Negrodamus for Chappelle’s Show, or even as the actor who played Sam Cooke in The Buddy Holly Story. Those paying closer attention know that Mooney was Richard Pryor’s writer, mentor, confidante, and designated driver, and that he was the comedy brain trust behind some of Pryor’s best bits.

Born in Shreveport, Louisiana in 1941, Mooney moved to Oakland in his youth and was raised by his grandmother—a big, proud, loving woman who slept with a hammer for protection. Compared to Pryor, who was raised among pimps and whores and other ne’er-do-wells, Mooney had a stable upbringing and developed into a brash, cocky, ambitious teetotaler; Pryor, of course, was a legendary self-loathing drug addict.

Mooney and Pryor met in 1968 and were close friends until Pryor’s 2005 death. Mooney’s place in the pantheon of American stand-up comics is assured, but his contributions to the Pryor legend have gone mostly uncredited and unknown. In Black Is the New White Mooney not only lays claim to his part of the story, he also illuminates an under-told chapter in black Hollywood history: the period of the sixties and seventies when a surge of African American talent was met by the half-hearted embrace of a Hollywood that had not yet figured out how to exploit it. Mooney spoke with PopMatters by phone from his home in Harlem.

You and Richard Pryor were very different in many ways. Why did you bond so well?
Opposites attract. It’s something I can’t really put my finger on. It was just supposed to be. And Richard and I really had nothing to do with it. It just had to be, like old souls. Richard and I somewhere had been together as friends before. It’s like finding each other. It’s something you really can’t make sense of. It’s instinctual; it’s just the way it is.

The story of your first meeting, before you became friends, is hilarious.
I was living in a cheap apartment on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood. A bunch of people would come and stay there with us, because nobody had any money, and we let them all sleep on the floor and in the bathtub or wherever. I was having a party, and a friend of my sister’s, who was dancing at the Whiskey a Go-Go, had dated Richard and brought him to the apartment. This was during that whole era of [1969 comedy] Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice when everybody was sleeping with everybody. So Richard came in and said, “Let’s all get into bed and have an orgy.” And I threw him out.

You write about rubbing elbows with white celebrities during the late sixties, with Steve McQueen and other big stars slumming in South Los Angeles at legendary clubs like Maverick’s Flat. The Hollywood infatuation with black culture was already under way.
People don’t remember all this stuff going on back then. Janis Joplin fucking was crazy about Jimi Hendrix. She was in love with him. There was all this shit going on, Tammy Terrell, the Temptations, Motown, and everyone in Hollywood into this and that. Raquel Welch was coming out to Maverick’s, everybody came out to these fucking clubs, it was crazy. Then you had the reverse of that happening at the Candy Store [a Beverly Hills discotheque and celebrity haunt in the late 1960s], which was a white club that we integrated. And Richard and I used to go to all these private clubs all the time. It was crazy, it was so wild. And before our time, Marilyn Monroe would come out to the black area too. A black designer took her somewhere and they fired him… Because she was out there, and they would say, “Oh look, she’s out there with them niggers.”

This racist stuff is crazy. White people are always trying to write their bullshit out of history, because they don’t want people to know how evil they were. I mean, how do you sit somewhere and show how evil you are? Wrong is wrong, whether it’s 1801 or 1901 or 2001. It doesn’t change what’s right and what’s wrong. People don’t like to see it written down. It’s too ugly. Tennessee Williams knew about the South, but he would clean it up and lie about it. He knew the women, he knew the racial thing, he knew everything. He knew the incest, the child abuse, all that shit. He had to hide it because those white folks would get angry. A Streetcar Named Desire: trust me when I tell you that Marlon Brando’s character was a Creole, he was a black man. You see that movie or read that book, you’ll see it in between the lines. All Southerners know. Northerners won’t pick up on it, but we knew right away what it was about.

Black Comics Find A Hot African-American Comedy Scene In Nashville — No Joke

 Black Comics Find A Hot African-American Comedy Scene In Nashville — No Joke
By Ron Wynn
Nashville Scene
published: March 25, 2010

There’s plenty of funny business happening in Music City, and some of it has nothing to do with the dubious budgetary practices of local officials or buffoon ideologues. Nashville’s black community has a comedy scene that’s now exploding alongside its more prominent and publicized theatrical and musical ones.

Such locales as The Corner Bar on Elliston Place, Café Bella and Nashville Center Stage are home base for many popular events. These include Money Marc and Sleezy’s Wild Funny Wednesdays (8:30 p.m. weekly), Renard and B-Cov’s Urban Soul Comedy Hour (8:30 p.m. each Thursday) and Just Jokes (bi-monthly shows). It’s a safe bet the jokes and routines unveiled at these places are spicier, voiced differently and emerge from a cultural base and perspective that’s not heavily represented on late-night network television or Saturday Night Live.

“Nashville is growing and there are a lot of new clubs and bars opening up and looking for ways to bring customers to their venue,” says Renard Hirsch, who sees expanding local opportunities for black comics. “Many of them are looking for ways to bring customers to their venue and comedy is always an option, 'cuz who doesn’t want to laugh?”

Hirsch, Brian B Cov Covington and Atlanta-based Nashville native Kevin “Renegade” Green are among the most well-known and popular comics making regular appearances at various Music City sites. They understand and appreciate the demands placed on comics in general and the inevitable issues faced by African-Americans operating in the genre regarding content, direction and sensibility.

“You don’t want to be labeled as just a 'black' comic,” Hirsch says, "because you don’t want to put limits on what you can do. I do mainstream, urban, clean, Blue Collar, Christian, whatever. The crowds are all different and that is part of what keeps comedy interesting and challenging, trying to find that pure joke that transcends race and makes everybody in the room laugh.”

“Most of my show is political and social topics because those are the topics that’s relevant to everyone,” says Green. “That and family. I try and stay abreast with what’s going on in society. Knowing your audience is the biggest thing to me. I have to understand who I’m trying to make laugh.”

“I’ve always said my life is a sitcom,” Covington says. “I’ve had a white stepfather since I was 13, my grandmother was half black and half Mexican, my mother is one of the funniest people I know, and I was married with a family by age 21. Once you throw in my in-laws, it’s like the perfect storm of comedy. Along with the fact I was the chubby kid in school that made good grades, so my ability to entertain and make people laugh was more a defense mechanism than a talent!”

They are also 21st century comics. Green got his start doing open mic nights around Nashville in 2001, and four years later he was appearing with many others, including Covington and Hirsch. Hirsch found stand-up to be his forte while majoring in speech and theater at TSU in 2001, and Covington began in late summer that same year.

In addition, they’ve come of professional age in an era when the content and linguistic freedom afforded Richard Pryor, Paul Mooney and Eddie Murphy — not to mention such predecessors as Redd Foxx, Nipsey Russell and Slappy White — is under siege from advocacy groups zealously trying to protect the African-American image from what they deem overused stereotypes, vulgar personas and one-dimensional portrayals. Still, they maintain they are unconcerned with political correctness.

“When I go onstage I don’t go with the intent to say something that is going to scare the pants off the audience," Hirsch says. "I’m not knocking comics who do, it just isn’t my style. My goal is to make people laugh at some everyday topics, enjoy life and forget the stresses of the day.”

Covington, for his part, says he doesn't worry about political correctness because he likes the challenge of getting a laugh with inoffensive material. Still, he says, a comic must walk a fine line.

“You want to have that edge that people expect of comedians, but you also don’t want your crowd to feel uncomfortable," he says. "The best comedians can say what people are thinking but don’t know to get it out the right way. I think people enjoy and respect you when you’re honest. B.S. does have an odor!”

“I’m a comedian,” Green says. “I tell jokes. I don’t say anything to be mean-spirited or disrespectful. Club owners worry about political correctness more than comedians. Now saying that, I don’t talk as brash when I’m doing a mainstream show as when I’m doing an urban show.”

Their ability to simultaneously be universal and specific also reflects their array of influences. Covington cites G-rated types like Bill Cosby, Sinbad and Flip Wilson, and has equal praise for Billy Crystal, Robert Townsend and Damon Wayans. Green’s just as quick to rave about George Carlin as Bernie Mac and Dave Chappelle, while voicing special praise for a colleague, local performer T.C. Cope. Hirsch’s long list of favorites includes both Chris Rock and Zack Galifianakis. Thus their material has scope, topicality and variety, and can easily be shaped to work in any particular place and reach any audience.

While giving praise to promoters and behind the scenes types like AG Granderson (the guiding light that’s helped make both Jazz and Jokes and his newest venture Just Jokes prime factors in the city’s comic world) and John Wright (a central figure behind the Urban Soul Comedy Hour), Hirsch, Covington and Green feel things are just getting started for black comedians in Nashville.

“I feel like this is a 'perfect storm' situation because when we started the Wednesday-night dates lots of new talented people came out, and now we have a bigger comedy community than ever,” Hirsch says. “I think black comedy is taking off because we get out and hustle to get people in seats.

“Contrary to what a lot of folks in Nashville think we [black folk] will get out and support.” Covington says. “Now we’ve got a new wave of comedians that look up to us, like we got a TV show or something, just because we’ve been doing it longer. So we don’t look at them like competition; it’s just more funny people around that can help the movement here. We all promote and support each other because one person isn’t going to get this city on the map as far as comedy goes.”

But their focus is even broader than that suggests. “It should be noted that our stages are open to every ethnicity," Renard Hirsch says. "Black, brown, white, green, it doesn’t matter. Funny is funny.”

(Renard Hirsch and Brian B-Cov Covington’s Soul Comedy Hour stars 8 p.m. Thursday at Café Bella, 209 8th Ave. South. Admission is $5. Check Kevin Green’s facebook page for updates on his Nashville appearances.)

Did A White Sheriff And District Attorney Orchestrate A Race-Based Coup In A Northern Louisiana Town?

Did A White Sheriff And District Attorney Orchestrate A Race-Based Coup In A Northern Louisiana Town?
By Jordan Flaherty

In the small northeast Louisiana town of Waterproof, the African-American mayor and police chief assert that they have been forced from office and arrested as part of an illegal coup carried out by the region's white political power structure. In a lawsuit filed last week, Police Chief Miles Jenkins describes a wide-ranging conspiracy led by the area’s district attorney and parish sheriff. These charges come at a time of widespread and high-profile racist attacks against the US President and Black members of Congress nationwide, and in a state where white political corruption and violence have been and continue to be used as tools to suppress Black political representation.

About 800 people live in Waterproof, a rural community in Tensas Parish that is 88% African American. Tensas has just over 6,000 residents, making it both the smallest parish in the state, and the parish with the state’s fastest declining population. The area schools remain mostly segregated, with nearly all the Black students attending public schools, and nearly all the white students attending private schools. With a median household income of $10,250, Waterproof is also one of the poorest communities in the US. The only jobs for Black people in town involve working for white farmers, according to Chief Jenkins. “Unless you go out of town to work,” he says, “You’re going to ride the white man’s tractor. That's it.”

Bobby Higginbotham was elected mayor of Waterproof in September of 2006. The next year, he appointed Miles Jenkins as chief of police. Jenkins, who served in the US military for 30 years and earned a master’s degree in public administration from Troy University in Alabama, immediately began the work of professionalizing a small town police department that had previously been mostly inactive. “You called the Waterproof police for help before,” says Chief Jenkins, “He would say, wait ‘til tomorrow, it’s too hot to come out today.” The new mayor also sought to reform the town’s financial practices, which Chief Jenkins says were in disorder and consumed by debt.

Ms. Annie Watson, a Black school board member in her 60s who was born and raised in Waterproof, worked as a volunteer for the mayor. She says that the mayor and chief, who had both lived in New Orleans, brought a new attitude that Parish officials didn’t like. “The Mayor and the Chief said you can’t treat people this way, and the Sheriff and DA said you got to know your place. If you're educated and intelligent and know your rights in this parish, you are in trouble,” she says. “They are determined to let you know you have a place and if you don't jump when they say jump you are in trouble.”

Ms. Watson explains that Parish Sheriff Rickey Jones and District Attorney James Paxton were threatened by Chief Jenkins’ efforts to professionalize the town’s police force. Aside from representing a challenge to Sheriff Jones’ political power, this also took away a source of his funding. “Before Mayor Higginbotham, all traffic tickets went to St. Joseph,” she says, referring to the Parish seat, where Sheriff Jones is based. “So he cut their income by having a police department.”

Jack McMillan, an African American deputy sheriff who works with Sheriff Jones, says he tried to warn Chief Jenkins to back down. “You’ve got to adapt to your environment,” he says. “You can't come to a small town and do things the same way you might in a big city. Like the song says, you got to know when to hold ‘em, and know when to fold ‘em.”

Chief Jenkins asserts that the white-led political infrastructure, led by the Sheriff Jones and DA Paxton, were threatened by their actions. This group immediately sought to orchestrate a coup against the two Black men, including clandestine meetings, false arrests, harassment, and even physical violence. Court documents describe how Paxton, Jones, and their allies formed an alliance “designed to harass intimidate, arrest, imprison, prosecute, illegally remove plaintiff from his position of police chief, prevent plaintiff from performing his law duties as police chief and/or force plaintiff to leave the town of Waterproof.”

Tensas Parish

Prior to the registration of 15 voters in 1964, there was not a single Black voter registered in Tensas, despite having more than 7,000 African American residents (and about 4,000 white residents), making it the last parish in Louisiana to allow African Americans to register. Tensas and the nearby parishes of Madison and East Carroll all share the sixth judicial district – currently represented by District Attorney Paxton. It is a small but influential district - Buddy Caldwell, DA for the sixth judicial district from 1979 to 2008, is now Attorney General for the state of Louisiana. The sixth district parishes all have majority Black populations and mostly white elected officials, which Chief Jenkins and Ms. Watson attribute to political corruption and disenfranchisement of Black voters.

Waterproof is “Reminiscent of the bygone days of southern politics,” with a white power structure maintaining political power over a Black majority, according to veteran civil rights attorney Ron Wilson, who is representing Jenkins in his civil rights lawsuit. “At any and all costs, even jeopardizing the life and freedom of my client, they will ruin him to maintain power. This case is ultimately about whether an African-American can be guaranteed the rights that are assured to him in the constitution.” According to court papers, this Jim Crow alliance dominates elected power in the area, and "even on the local level, where the office holders tend to be African American, they are powerless to control their own destiny.” According to Chief Jenkins, the District Attorney once boasted that he controlled the votes of Waterproof’s Black aldermen.

Chief Jenkins says he faced an immediate campaign of harassment. “They just wanted this town to be white-controlled,” explained Chief Jenkins. The police chief described being arrested multiple times under the order of DA Paxton and Sheriff Jones. The charges, says Jenkins, range from charges of theft for a pay raise he received from the town’s board of Aldermen to criminal trespass for going to the home of a citizen who had been stopped for speeding without a valid driver’s license, to disturbing the peace for an incident where individuals threatened the police chief with violence for issuing traffic citations. Ms. Watson says the charges were invented out of thin air. “It was a sad case of lies,” she says, adding that, “The majority of the town of Waterproof supports the chief and supports the mayor.”

Chief Jenkins says he was arrested and declared a flight risk by District Attorney Paxton, despite living and owning property in the Parish. “In all my years,” says attorney Ron Wilson, “I've never seen a police officer, and certainly not a police chief, charged for something like this.” Chief Jenkins alleges he was attacked and choked by a deputy sheriff, who he says shouted, "Shut up...We are in charge…We are the sheriff and the sheriff controls Tensas Parish. The sooner you all learn this the better off you will be," an action that Ms. Watson says she also witnessed.

Chief Jenkins says his police car was shoved in a ditch, and when he arrested the people who had committed the act, the DA refused to press charges. In fact, he says the DA refused almost all charges he presented and released anyone he arrested. The chief was even charged with kidnapping for one incident in which he arrested the former town clerk for illegal entry. “That’s the most ludicrous notion I've ever come across,” says Wilson. “That a police chief can be arrested for kidnapping, because he placed someone under arrest who was breaking the law.”

A grand jury has returned indictments of Chief Jenkins and Mayor Higginbotham, and Higginbotham’s trial is scheduled to begin this Monday. The mayor faces 44 charges, including multiple counts of malfeasance in office and felony theft. The charges appear to be based on the results of a state audit of Waterproof that found irregularities in the town’s record keeping going back to before the election of Higginbotham – irregularities that the mayor and police chief say they had repaired.

Patterns of Violence

Mayor Higginbotham was elected at the same time as two other Black mayors of small Louisiana towns, both of whom also received threats based on race. In December of 2006, shortly after Higginbotham was elected mayor of Waterproof, Gerald Washington was shot and killed three days before he was to become the first Black mayor of the small southwest Louisiana town of Westlake. An official investigation called his death a suicide, but family members call it an assassination. Less than two weeks after that, shots were fired into the house of Earnest Lampkins, the first Black mayor of the northwest Louisiana town of Greenwood. Lampkins reported that he continued to receive threats throughout his term, including a “for sale” sign that someone planted outside his house.

Waterproof was Klan country from the reconstruction era until well into the 20th century, and racist violence was common in the region. Eight Black men in Madison Parish were lynched over a period of three days in 1894 for the charge of “insurrection,” apparently because one man refused to follow an order from a sheriff. “The Klan was very active here,” says Ms. Watson, recalling her childhood in Waterproof. “We had crosses burned on people’s lawns. The school principal had a cross burned on his lawn. A man named Sun Turner was shot and killed on the streets by the Klan.”

Waterproof is an hour south of Tallulah, the site of a notoriously abusive youth prison, and a little more than hour east of Jena, where accusations of systemic racism brought 50,000 people from around the country, including many civil rights leaders, to a 2007 march. Like Jena, Waterproof is also home to a prison that contracts to hold federal immigration prisoners.

When asked for comment on Chief Jenkins’ lawsuit, Tensas Parish Sheriff Jones denied that race was a factor, claiming that Jenkins had abused his office and that many of the local citizens who filed complaints against him were Black. “I'm not going to support any type of corruption,” said Jones. “Certainly not from him.” District Attorney Paxton, also named as a defendant in the lawsuit, disputed all accusations from Jenkins, suggesting that he had tried to help Jenkins when he was first elected. “A lot of this will become clear when the case against Mayor Higginbotham goes to trial on Monday,” he added.

Flood Caldwell, one of the town’s aldermen, is currently serving as the town’s mayor. Jenkins points to Caldwell’s appointment as further evidence of a coup, saying that the town aldermen, under the direction of DA Paxton, illegally voted to remove Mayor Higginbotham. “No one recognizes Caldwell as mayor except the DA and his friends,” says Chief Jenkins. The office of the Louisiana Secretary of State confirms that they still have Higginbotham listed as mayor, adding that they cannot comment further because of pending litigation.

Wilson says this case is ultimately about the repression of Black political and civil rights. “I think this has been going on in Tensas for a while,” he says. “I think they’ve gone too far in this case, and someone finally has come along and says they won’t go along.” Wilson hopes this lawsuit will bring federal attention. “We hope the justice department will look into this and bring some much-needed reform to this part of the world,” he says.

Chief Jenkins says he took the Sheriff’s job to serve the community, “You’ve given this country the best years of your life and you get treated like an unwanted stepchild,” he says. “I didn't realize there was so much politics to just doing your job.”

Ms. Watson believes that this is a struggle for self-determination and basic civil rights. “I was born in 1948,” she says. “Ever since I was born, Blacks never had a say in this parish, until Chief Jenkins and Mayor Higginbotham. They spoke up, and tried to change things. That’s why the parish is going after them.”

Jacques Morial of the Louisiana Justice Institute contributed to this story.

Jordan Flaherty is a journalist, an editor of Left Turn Magazine, and a staffer with the Louisiana Justice Institute. He was the first writer to bring the story of the Jena Six to a national audience. Haymarket Press will release his new book, FLOODLINES: Stories of Community and Resistance from Katrina to the Jena Six, in 2010. He can be reached at neworleans@leftturn.org.

W.E. A.L.L. B.E. News & Radio Special~Never Forget: Hurricane Katrina Three Years Later...
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/weallbe/2008/08/31/Tha-Artivist-PresentsWE-ALL-BE-News-Radio

More Jordan Flaherty On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.:
http://weallbe.blogspot.com/search?q=jordan+flaherty

Black Students Right Not To Take It Anymore After Mocking...

By
Donald Kaul
News-Leader.com
March 26, 2010

A few weeks ago some frat boys at the University of California, San Diego, pulled what they thought of as a prank -- just a fun thing.

In mock honor of Black History Month they held an off-campus "Compton Cookout," named after the largely black suburb of Los Angeles a few dozen miles up the road.

The organizers invited guests to wear "grills," those fake gold teeth favored by gangsta rappers and thuggish athletes, as well as the baggy athletic clothes worn by those groups.

And, oh yes, watermelon was served.

Well, you can imagine how funny the black students at the school found all of that. There's nothing a rising African-American college student enjoys more than being branded with a demeaning racial
stereotype.

But that wasn't all. After black student groups had protested the cookout, a campus television program (described as satirical) broadcast a feature on the party, complete with a vile racial epithet ridiculing the protesting students.

In the midst of this, the administration opened up a Web site announcing a number of policy changes designed to mollify the protesters.

It didn't work. There were more meetings, more protests. Then someone hung a noose from a
bookcase in the main library.

That tore it for the black students and their allies. A multicultural mob of chanting, drum-beating
students marched on the chancellor's office and demanded action.

The chancellor at long last was forced to confront the students. Standing in front of her office, using a bullhorn to address the crowd, she said: "We will not tolerate hate on our campus."

After which the students charged the building and occupied her office.

Eventually things settled down and the issue became one of dueling Facebook pages.

I have two thoughts:

First, being a kind of 1950s person myself, I don't generally favor students taking over campus buildings. I didn't like it in the 1960s anti-war protests. I don't like it now.

But in this case I'll make an exception. An event like the Compton Cookout in the second decade of the 21st century is so egregious, and the university's initial response so muted, that the situation demanded a dramatic response -- a "we're mad as Hell and we're not going to take it anymore" sort of response. Under the circumstances, taking over the chancellor's office was appropriate.

The second thought is the next time someone calls me "politically correct" for taking offense at a crude, mean-spirited, hurtful word or gesture, I shall place one of my Ukrainian grandmother's leprosy curses on them and their progeny.

Shouting "PC" has become the right's all-purpose defense, putting conservatism in danger of becoming the spiritual home of galloping yahooism. Not Yahoo! as in the Internet search engine, but yahoo as it appears in Gulliver's Travels, meaning a base, savage creature of brutish sensibility.

You hear examples all the time on right-wing radio:
crude racist, sexist, or homophobic remarks delivered by Don Imus, Rush Limbaugh, and the rest. And when you object to the garbage they accuse you of political correctness.

Preferring civil discourse to ignorant vituperation isn't politically correct, it's simply correct.

And don't imagine that the Compton Cookout should have been of concern only to blacks. The event could as easily have targeted Jews, gays, Latinos, Asian-Americans, or women. Left unchecked, the forces that inspired that debacle will find other victims. That's a given.

You can't isolate group hatred or ethnic prejudice. They're like cancers that attack first one organ, then quickly metastasize to others.

And if that's being politically correct, count me in.

See More About "Compton Cookout" On W.E. A.L.L. B.E.: